Share this
ULPA VS. HEPA Filter: What's the Difference & Why Does It Matter?
by HEPACART on Mar 19, 2020
Understand when and why to choose HEPA or ULPA.
The HEPA filter gets mentioned frequently in this blog because it's effective technology that is central to HEPACART’s® mission: protecting patients from dust and pathogens in hospitals and other hazardous environments.
While all HEPA filters (High-Efficiency Particulate Air) meet ASME and DOE standards of 99.97%, some are more efficient. For instance, our HEPAFORCE® Negative Air Machines function at 99.99% efficiency. We call this "medical-grade" HEPA filtration.
You may be aware that there's a filter that removes even smaller particles, called the ULPA (Ultra-Low Particulate Air) filter. The ULPA standard requires removal of 99.999% of particles down to 0.12 microns. That sounds much more effective than HEPA, so a legitimate question arises: When comparing ULPA vs. HEPA filters, why stick with HEPA?
In the words of Ricky Ricardo, we got some 'splainin' to do.
How Does Filtration Work?
First, let's take a detour to understand the behavior of particles moving through air filters. Both HEPA and ULPA filters consist of innumerable tiny strands of randomly arranged borosilicate glass microfibers.
Flowing through this vast labyrinth of fibers, particles get arrested through various physical mechanisms, the main three being interception, inertial impaction, and diffusion.
Interception occurs when the airstream carries a particle close enough to a fiber to stick to it.
Inertial impaction happens to larger particles that are too heavy to continue following the airstream as it flows around the fibers, so they collide with them and stick to them.
Diffusion describes the movement of the tiniest particles (below 0.1 micrometers) as they get knocked around by the Brownian motion of gas molecules in the air. Their erratic, zigzag path makes it more likely that they will collide with fibers.
Far from acting as a simple sieve, then, a fibrous air filter actually defies common sense by trapping smaller and larger particles more effectively than midsize particles. The worst-case particle size happens to be 0.3 micrometers, and that fact helped drive the design parameters of the HEPA filter.
ULPA vs. HEPA Filter Systems
OK, but if ULPA is better than HEPA at capturing more and smaller particles (such as tiny viruses), why are we still using HEPA?
It's because, in this case, "better" is only true in a narrowly-defined sense. While ULPA filters collect more particles in that hard-to-trap 0.12-0.4 range, they are only necessary for specialized applications such as microelectronics manufacturing or medical laboratories, removing particulates from cleanrooms, or filtering toxic surgical plumes emitted during electro-surgical operations.
HEPA filters, by contrast, are much more broadly used because they're considered optimal for most biological applications, including healthcare. As an example of why HEPA filters work so well in hospitals, consider that viruses, which are smaller than 0.3 micrometers and theoretically could pass through a HEPA filter, most often travel on larger particles such as saliva or sweat, thereby being trapped.
In short, here are some disadvantages that come with using ULPA filters.
Restricted Airflow: The main reason why you can't just swap in a ULPA filter for a HEPA filter is that the ULPA filter is more restrictive. As we discussed in this blog several years ago, a key difference between HEPA and ULPA is airflow. The denser media of the ULPA filter reduces airflow 20% to 50% for filters of the same dimensions. This greater pressure drop would lower a key metric, air changes per hour (ACH), to an unacceptably low level, resulting in worse air quality in a room.
Higher Cost: Since ULPA filters have denser media and are harder to produce than HEPA filters, they cost approximately 35 percent more than HEPA filters. And the cost of filters is only part of the story. Designing a ULPA system to deliver the same ACH as a HEPA system would require a larger filter to make up for the more restrictive flow, and possibly a more powerful blower, making the entire filter system larger and more expensive.
Shorter Life: Another thing that makes ULPA filters more costly is their shorter life, which averages five to eight years, compared to about 10 for HEPA filters in similar use. Also pre-filters are often used to protect the finer filters downstream, so additional pre-filtration could be necessary to protect the ULPA filter.
Conclusion
While at first, it may seem as if simply replacing your HEPA filter with a ULPA filter is a good idea, we hope you now understand why that wouldn't work. A filtration system designed for a certain airflow must be designed to anticipate the filter element's resistance to flow, and a ULPA filter would be too restrictive in a system designed for HEPA. More important is that ULPA filtration would be expensive overkill if substituted for HEPA in most applications.
Too often, procedures fail even when the right equipment is used. So what's most important is following the infection control precautions outlined in the ICRA Matrix, such as properly installing temporary barriers, creating a negative air environment with HEPA-equipped filtration machines, and cleaning with HEPA filtered vacuums.
For those charged with minimizing airborne dust and pathogens during construction in healthcare settings, HEPA filters are still the recommended standard. To get additional perspective, download our ULPA vs. HEPA Guide.
Additional resources
Share this
- Infection Control (87)
- Dust Containment (67)
- Facility Management (63)
- Facility Construction & Renovation (41)
- Air Filtration & Disinfection (23)
- AnteRoom (15)
- Patient Safety (14)
- Indoor Air Quality (12)
- HEPAFORCE®AIR Negative Air Machines & Scrubbers (11)
- HEPAFORCE® GermBuster Room Air Purifiers (10)
- Healthcare (9)
- DUSTBUGGY® Dust Containment Cart (8)
- HEPACART® Dust Containment Cart (8)
- Cabling Access & Ceiling Access (7)
- UV-FORCE® Airborne Disinfection Module (7)
- STARC® Dust Containment Wall Barriers (6)
- Education (5)
- Healthcare Facility Construction & Renovation (4)
- About HEPACART (3)
- Electrical Installation & Repair (3)
- Surface Disinfection (2)
- February 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (5)
- December 2022 (4)
- November 2022 (4)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (2)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (2)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- February 2021 (2)
- January 2021 (2)
- December 2020 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (2)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (2)
- June 2019 (5)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (1)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (5)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (4)
- May 2017 (5)
- April 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (3)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (3)
- March 2016 (5)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (4)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (5)
- July 2015 (3)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (4)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (7)
- February 2015 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (2)
- August 2014 (2)
- July 2014 (1)
- June 2014 (1)
- May 2014 (2)